What's A Critic For?
Inevitably, if you write about bands and you speak your mind, sooner or later you're going to push somebody's buttons. Christine Martucci was gravely offended by my coverage of the Asbury Music Awards and wrote to tell me so. Normally I wouldn't reprint a private email, but Christine also posted a comment on this blog, which I believe moves this into the realm of public discourse. Here is Ms. Martucci's email to me:
My darling Jim,
Read your blog about the "Asbury Park has this soft spot for frumpy, middle-aged, middle-of-the-road performers like Christine Martucci, Lance Larson, Jodi Joseph, Sonny Kenn, and Boccigalupe & The Bad Boys... and the Awards show always makes room for them. You gotta love that; it would be unthinkable for performers that far afield of trendy or stylish to be represented at a similar awards ceremony in Brooklyn or Hoboken."
What the hell dude do you even know who I am? or what I have done? Or what I do? You see a poorly managed awards show and you come down on Jersey musicians trying to make something of themselves, I bet you think Ashlee Simpson rocks too right?
Really Jim get your facts straight before you call me a "frumpy middle aged, middle of the road singer" I have been around the country the past three years after a national release of my critically acclaimed CD "Mama Says". I have been opening for major label recording acts, while your little baby bands were home in bed with a curfew.
Also am working with Dishwalla and Tonic on my next CD as well as a two time grammy winning producer who I am sure is much more qualified then you.
So good luck with your spewing of hate, I have nothing but respect for my fellow musicians and artists, poets and writers, especially Jersey people. By the way Springsteen as you know SELLS out shows in minutes, not to (sic) bad to emulate and to have seen him live as well, I think instead of copying everyone else a little difference is good, dont you?
Good luck to you
Sincerely
Christine Martucci
Now, granted, in an effort to be flip and funny, I sometimes go too far, and forget that I'm writing about real human beings who might actually read what I've written. "Frumpy" certainly wasn't the kindest word I could have used. And I'm the last person who should be making derogatory remarks about a performer's age. "Middle-aged, middle-of-the-road" wasn't meant to be disparaging; it was just reporting what I saw (and, just to make it clear, I was talking about entire bands, not individual personalities.) I defy anyone who was at the Awards show to tell me my "facts" were wrong. If I hurt Christine Martucci's feelings, I apologize. But if she thinks her music is cutting edge and not middle of the road, well... that's her opinion. I have mine, and I stand by it.
More problematic is the attitude that I had no right to comment on Ms. Martucci's performance or appearance: "Who the hell are you?" "Spewing of hate" "I have nothing but respect for my fellow musicians" (implying that I, clearly, do not.)
Let me tell you a little bit about me, darling. I've been writing about music for 25 years - 23 with my own self-published fanzine, over a dozen years as a weekly columnist for my local daily newspaper, and if you want to drop names, I've been published in Rolling Stone, the Village Voice, Guitar World, Request, Harp, dozens of other zines and websites, and several books.
Calling 'em as I see 'em isn't "spewing hate;" it's telling the truth, at least as I perceive it. And if I only wrote nice things about bands, I wouldn't be serving the best interests of anyone - not the musicians, certainly not the fans, definitely not myself, and not music as a whole. My respect for musicians is unparalleled and unqualified; that's why I hold them up to a standard. They call it "rock criticism" for a reason. I realize that if your only exposure to music journalism is The Aquarian, you might not understand that. But it doesn't change the fact that if you want to enjoy the privilege of standing on a stage and entertaining people, you become part of a process that, yes, includes rock critics.
What really seems at issue here is that Ms.Martucci seems aghast that anyone would want to criticize her and her music, when she works so hard and means so well. I applaud those efforts; they're just not my cup of tea. Bad reviews come with the territory; you should see some of the things people have written about me. But I don't write angsty, anguished, hurt letters; I either brush it off and roll with the punches; or if the criticism is justified, take it to heart and try to grow from the experience. If you really wanted to get back at me, you'd write a funny, catchy song about what a putz I am, and post it on the Internet.
And if I liked the song, you damn well better believe that I'd write a glowing review of it.
Wednesday, November 09, 2005
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)


10 comments:
the new ashlee simpson single is good. *rehearsing my choir*, too.
She left the Dishwalla comment sitting right there for you and you didn't take it. That showed class. Well done.
Well Jim, Bravo!
Well done, I do not just read the Aquarian, actually havent read it in years.
I do have critics yes, some like me, some love me, some do not like me so much.
As for your apology I accept. Thankyou.
I guess you do not like Dishwalla?
As to Oliver's comment?
Yes your right we as artists do put ourselves out there to be criticised. I am not going to turn your forum into a Christne Martucci bashing place.
So I am just going to say that I do not agree with the middle-aged, middle of the road comment; and the fact that you wrote
(paraphrase of course)
"and the Stone Pony always has a soft spot for us middle aged frumpy performers...
did you know I have opened for Kansas; Gavin Degraw, Johnny Winter, Doobie Brothers, Scandal; to name a few?
Did you know that?
I also admire Jody Joseph, she has been giving back to the music community for years and what you said is just not right Jim.
Sorry but your wrong.
Now all Your fans can bash me all they want and you know whatever, I call em like I see em too Jimbo.
And that is that.
Rock ON!
Christine Martucci
PS-
I will write a song about this, that would be cool, anyways I wanted to say also I really liked your response to my email, good writing dude, I see why you have been published and have a fanzine; I also want to give you props for
for standing by what you believe in, all I will say is when my new album is released next year, Jim I am sending you one.
Take Care
and Keep writing the truth.
after all it does set us free.
Rock on
Christine Martucci
Jim, I agree with you...unless of course you ever give my band a bad review...
It is weird when somebody writes about me and they think they know me based on a song I wrote or they assume something about me that isn't true. It's happened to me a couple of times. Still, in the end it comes with the territory and you have to let it roll off your back.
Christine, my advice to you would be to buy Jim a couple of Stella's and give him a ride home and he'll be your friend for life.
That could be arranged Paul, thanks for the advise.
Keep rocking!
Christine
PS-what is a stella? :P
All this does actually bring up a decent point. Most criticism written - and read - is in the realm of, say, movies, television shows, books, exhibitions by established artists, and signed major bands. In all cases, entities that can withstand and weather a negative review, or especially a well-intentioned positive review that may miss what the artist believes to be an important mark. Actually, i can only think of music, rock, criticism of an example where a review / critique may be the person's FIRST exposure whatsoever to an act or performer, and where that is a wide-spread occurence. I may never have heard of a certain band, a band that's hoping to get a start or a lucky break, or still in certain stages of development. I may not have any idea what they sound like, before stumbling across an review of their performance / demo, which would subsequently be the only context in which i can put this band. A negative review, or even one with reference points to bands that don't jibe with what the performer is probably trying to put across would make me, the reader, a bit leary to explore this band further. So, here is the trick, and that is to ensure that the review was somehow *solicited*. If someone sends a demo to Jim, they care what Jim thinks, and Jim writes a review. If someone is performing, however, a mere mismatch in tastes between a reviewer and an artist might be disasterous in the setback of the latter. Now, obviously, i don't find anything Jim wrote to be particularly negative, "guilt by association" at worst; and Tucci, given her credentials, certainly should be in a position where she can afford to ignore Jim's assessment of the show, at least according to Tucci. But there's a lesson here, somewhere: criticism should be in some way solicited. Otherwise, make sure to couch your assessments in a discussion of personal tastes, and let others make their own judgements based on their knowledge of your preferences and history as a reviewer. I think it's to Jim's credit that i was able to approximate the sound - and how i would react - to Tucci's work based on his article (verified with subsequent listening), but Jim's been writing for a while, and not every one's intentions are nearly is this easy to discern. I don't know. I hope i'm not coming across as heavy-handed here.
p.s. Stella = Stella Artios, a Belgian beer, and a quite refreshing one.
Jens -
I see your point, but I would argue two things. First, I was primarily writing about the Asbury Music Awards as a journalist covering an event; secondly, the Awards were not only a public forum, but one with a $15 cover. By agreeing to perform at such an event, Christine and the other acts on the bill "solicited" a review simply by the act of participating in the rock concert process. If you want to play in your bedroom and perform free shows for your friends in your basement, then your music remains your own. Once you step onto a public stage to perform, you're fair game.
One thing this debate has done is to remind me what a tiny, insular, elitist, self-referential world we indie rockers live in. There's a whole universe of people out there like Christine who believe that Dishwalla and Johnny Winter and Scandal constitute "real" music, while what "we" in the indie underground whatever coommunity do is inconsequential noise. And in a way, they're right. When what you do reaches dozens rather than millions, it doesn't hurt to retain a little humility.
Jim, you did a great job by allowing both sides to comment..you"the enemy"(sorry from the moie rockstar) and "us" the artists; thanks for letting me have a chance to give my perspective on your review, and Jens, you called me Tucci, only my friends know me by that name..hmmm do I know you?
I enjoyed reading your comment.
Thank you for another perspective.
And, what is Indie underground?
I want to know the definition as you see it. I know I just walked into a lions den by posting here, but it is good to read and evaluate how the other half lives.
-the journalist-the one listening-
PS-would love to have a discussion over some Stella's...
all journalists invited and indie artists too, this could be an awesome forum, get to know the people you are reviewing. ;)
Post a Comment